People on both sides have deep feelings toward legalising some substance. This essay is not meant to be an opinion piece, but rather an attempt to examine certain general topics, data, and financial problems around marijuana legalisation.
Harry Anslinger, the then-Commissioner of Narcotics, preached about weed in front of Congress, the medical profession, and the public, advising of the risks to society. As a result, congressional trials were held in 1937, with the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 as the result. This did not keep weed illegal, but it did establish a significant tax scheme that encompassed any aspect of the marijuana supply chain (cultivation, distribution, sale). The Act’s onerous existence reduced pot use to a blip on the radar.If you’re looking for more tips Cannabis store
Finally, in the 1940s, experiments started to demonstrate that hemp, as opposed to hard narcotics like cocaine and heroin, was comparatively safe. The connection between marijuana and violence was disproved, and it was determined that it was most likely related to the ingestion of alcohol alongside marijuana. Despite a growing body of evidence finding weed to be relatively (but not completely) safe, the general population saw it as harmful as a result of the legal framework that had been erected around it.
Marijuana usage grew in the 1950s and 1960s, but study was mostly based on LSD and other hard drugs. According to the National Institute of Mental Health, 20 million Americans had tried weed at least once by 1970. According to a Gallup survey from 1970, 42% of college students had smoked weed.
If further evidence reveals that weed does not lead to criminal activity, it’s only rational for citizens to believe that the federal departments in control of interpreting these topics have lied to them. To this day, medical marijuana must be purchased unlawfully in 35 jurisdictions, and patients must suffer in danger of federal action. Should marijuana legislation and policy be revisited? Will it be re-considered strictly for medical reasons, or should it be marketed alongside tobacco, cigars, and alcohol?
There was a movement in the 1970s to decriminalise limited quantities of weed. The common consensus among supporters of decriminalisation was that the prohibitions regarding marijuana were more dangerous than the substance itself. In 1977, President Jimmy Carter, as well as the American Medical Association and the American Bar Association, advocated for the decriminalisation of limited quantities of weed. That was not to be.
The 1980s saw a reversal in these measures, with President Ronald Reagan launching the War on Drugs, which saw stricter laws and sentences for about any opioid. During this decade, marijuana use decreased while tobacco, cocaine, and crack use increased. The 1990s witnessed a change in consumption patterns. Marijuana use of teenagers doubled between 1992 and 1994.
Marijuana is not without danger. There are about 400 compounds in the hemp plant, and we really don’t know anything about it. Should it, though, be made illegal? Should it continue to be classified as a Schedule 1 narcotic? It is a large cash crop, and controlling it could bring in substantial tax revenue while still reducing the need for too much litigation. Many medical and science experts have provided proof of marijuana’s therapeutic effects, and 15 states have legalised it for the treatment of chronic conditions.